From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicholson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

November, 1914.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.


The circumstances of plaintiff's [intestate's] alighting with other passengers from the street car at a point of transfer, and following his fellow-passengers toward the curb, showed no negligence. He was struck in the back by defendant's ash cart approaching from the rear. The deceased being free from contributory negligence, the question of burden of proof on that issue was merely academic. After having a full, clear and correct charge as to the duties of an alighting passenger, the jury could not fail to apply the right rule to the intestate's conduct. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Nicholson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1914
165 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Nicholson v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:Eugenie H. Nicholson, Administratrix, etc., of Charles Nicholson…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1914

Citations

165 App. Div. 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Citing Cases

Fitzsimons v. Isman

This was an erroneous instruction ( Sackheim v. Pigueron, 163 App. Div. 180), but did not harm the defendant…