From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicholson v. City of Bakersfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
No. 1:08-CV-01168-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:08-CV-01168-AWI-SKO

08-03-2011

AMYRA NICHOLSON; et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; et al., Defendants.

James C. Holland, Attorney for Plaintiffs AMYRA NICHOLSON; C.W., minor, by AMYRA NICHOLSON, G.A.L.; R.S.W., minor, by AMYRA NICHOLSON, G.A.L.; BRITTANY WILLIAMS MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE & LEHMAN MICHAEL LEHMAN, Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, BAKERSFIELD POLICE OFFICERS RICHARD DOSSEY, R. SLAYTON, K. URSERY, J. FINNEY, SCOTT TUNICLIFFE and SERGEANT MATT PFLUGH


JAMES C. HOLLAND; SBN 134233

Attorney at Law

Attorney for plaintiffs AMYRA NICHOLSON; C.W., minor, by AMYRA

NICHOLSON, G.A.L.; R.S.W., minor, by AMYRA NICHOLSON, G.A.L.;

BRITTANY WILLIAMS

STIPULATION AND ORDER

EXTENDING NON-DISPOSITIVE

MOTION FILING CUTOFF

AS TO REQUESTED INTERNAL

AFFAIRS MATERIALS

TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the parties, by and through counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Whereas, counsel continue to meet and confer in efforts to resolve the parties' differences as to production of Defendant City's Internal Affairs materials requested by Plaintiffs;

the Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Cutoff Date should be extended as to Defendant City's Internal Affairs materials requested by plaintiffs, so as to allow a motion to compel production of such materials to be heard by August 24, 2011 on shortened notice, in the event that the parties are unable to reach agreement.

James C. Holland, Attorney for

Plaintiffs AMYRA NICHOLSON; C.W.,

minor, by AMYRA NICHOLSON, G.A.L.;

R.S.W., minor, by AMYRA NICHOLSON,

G.A.L.; BRITTANY WILLIAMS

MARDEROSIAN, RUNYON, CERCONE &

LEHMAN

MICHAEL LEHMAN, Attorneys for

Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD,

BAKERSFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT,

BAKERSFIELD POLICE OFFICERS RICHARD

DOSSEY, R. SLAYTON, K. URSERY, J.

FINNEY, SCOTT TUNICLIFFE and

SERGEANT MATT PFLUGH

ORDER

The parties' stipulated request is GRANTED. The non-dispositive motion deadline shall be extended for the sole purpose of allowing the filing of a motion to compel as to Defendant City of Bakersfield's Internal Affairs materials, should the parties not reach an agreement regarding production of those documents.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Any motion to compel regarding Defendant City of Bakersfield's Internal Affairs materials shall be filed on or before August 9, 2011;
2. The opposition to such a motion to compel must be filed on or before August 15, 2011;
3. An optional reply brief may be filed on or before August 17, 2011; and
4. The motion to compel shall be heard on shortened time on August 24, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 8, 6th floor, before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Nicholson v. City of Bakersfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 3, 2011
No. 1:08-CV-01168-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Nicholson v. City of Bakersfield

Case Details

Full title:AMYRA NICHOLSON; et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

No. 1:08-CV-01168-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011)