From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nicholson v. Catholic Health Partners

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 12, 2009
CASE NO. 4:08CV2410 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2009)

Summary

holding that Ohio Civil Rule 10(D) is substantive

Summary of this case from Schumacher v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:08CV2410.

March 12, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon Defendants Catholic Health Partners, Saint Elizabeth's Health Center and Heath Dorion's ("Defendants") Motions to Dismiss. (Dkt. # 3, 9). On December 17, 2008, this Court issued an order assigning this case to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert for general pre-trial supervision. (Dkt. # 8). On February 10, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R"), recommending that the Court GRANT Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. (Dkt. # 11). Plaintiff timely filed objections to the R R. (Dkt. # 68).

The Court has reviewed the R R de novo, and finds that it is well-supported. The Court has also reviewed Plaintiff's objections and finds that they are without merit.

Therefore, the Magistrate Judge's R R is hereby ADOPTED. (Dkt. # 11). Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. (Dkt. # 3, 9).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Nicholson v. Catholic Health Partners

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 12, 2009
CASE NO. 4:08CV2410 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2009)

holding that Ohio Civil Rule 10(D) is substantive

Summary of this case from Schumacher v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

finding the Ohio rule to be a substantive rule of law in a diversity case

Summary of this case from Daniel v. U.S.

applying the outcome-determinative test and concluding that the rule is substantive

Summary of this case from Cross v. Marietta Opco, LLC
Case details for

Nicholson v. Catholic Health Partners

Case Details

Full title:ERIK W. NICHOLSON, PLAINTIFF, v. CATHOLIC HEALTH PARTNERS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 12, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 4:08CV2410 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. United States

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has yet to address the issue. See Kollin v. City of…

Schumacher v. Corr. Corp. of Am.

These rules require, "a complaint that contains a medical claim . . . as defined in section 2305.113 of the…