]" Adams v. State, 275 Ga. 867, 868 (3) ( 572 SE2d 545) (2002). See also Nichols v. State, 278 Ga.App. 46, 48 (1) ( 628 SE2d 131) (2006). Thus, "the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing [Ms.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Chandler's testimony. See Nichols v. State , 278 Ga. App. 46, 48 (1), 628 S.E.2d 131 (2006) (trial court's admission of expert testimony is reviewed for abuse of discretion); see also Green , supra at 172 (1), 835 S.E.2d 238 (trial court's ruling on compliance with criminal discovery statute is reviewed for an abuse of discretion). 2. Barraza argues that the trial court erred in sustaining the State's objection to his cross-examination of a detective.

(Punctuation omitted.) Nichols v. State, 278 Ga. App. 46 ( 628 SE2d 131) (2006).Id.