In Nichols, the California Penal Code required that the verdict of a jury be read before it was recorded and before the verdict was recorded, the jury could be polled at the request of either party.
Summary of this case from Maloney v. StateArgued June 9, 1881
Decided October 28, 1881
C.P. Hoffman for plaintiff in error.
Alonzo Wheeler for defendant in error.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except FOLGER, Ch. J., absent.
Order affirmed.
In Nichols, the California Penal Code required that the verdict of a jury be read before it was recorded and before the verdict was recorded, the jury could be polled at the request of either party.
Summary of this case from Maloney v. StateFull title:PATRICK NICHOLS, Plaintiff in Error, v . THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 28, 1881
Thus, there is clear precedent for considering some failures to follow statutory procedure as ordinary trial…
People v. AnzaloneThus, there is clear precedent for considering some failures to follow statutory procedure as ordinary trial…