From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Patterson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 24, 1943
25 S.E.2d 745 (S.C. 1943)

Opinion

15543

May 24, 1943.

Before E.H. HENDERSON, J., Anderson County, February, 1943. Affirmed.

Habeas Corpus proceeding by Roy Nichols against A. Howard Patterson, Acting Supervisor of Anderson County, South Carolina, to obtain release from custody. From Order of Judge Henderson refusing the Petition, Nichols appeals.

Mr. Edwin G. Patterson, of Anderson, S.C. Counsel for Appellant, filed a printed argument, citing no authorities.

Mr. Rufus Fant, Solicitor, of Anderson, S.C. for The State of South Carolina, Respondent, cites: As to construction of Sec. 1578, Code of S.C. 1942: 201 S.C. 221, 22 S.E.2d 590.


May 24, 1943.


Appellant, a second offender, was convicted of crime and sentenced in the Court of General Sessions for Anderson County during the September 1941 term, as follows: "The sentence of the Court is that the defendant be confined at hard labor in the State Penitentiary or on the public works of Anderson County for a period of two years. That upon the service of twenty months the balance of the sentence shall stand suspended during good behavior."

Having a record of "good behavior" and claiming a reduction therefor of one-fifth of his sentence, considering the latter to be twenty months, appellant sought his release by habeas corpus in January 1943. But the Circuit Court held that the recent authority of Thompson v. Patterson, 201 S.C. 221 S.E.2d 590, is applicable and remitted appellant to the County Supervisor, respondent here, in whose custody he was serving his sentence upon the chain gang.

Appellant took three exceptions to this ruling, but they make but one question, whether the reduction of sentence for good behavior provided by Section 1578 of the Code of 1942 should be calculated upon the whole sentence of two years or upon the unsuspended portion thereof, twenty months. In the case cited above and relied upon by the trial Court is the precise answer to the stated question, and its reasoning need not be repeated. Appellant advances no ground for distinguishing this case from it.

The exceptions are overruled.

Affirmed.

MESSRS. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES BAKER and FISHBURNE and CIRCUIT JUDGE J. HENRY JOHNSON, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM did not participate.


Summaries of

Nichols v. Patterson

Supreme Court of South Carolina
May 24, 1943
25 S.E.2d 745 (S.C. 1943)
Case details for

Nichols v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLS v. PATTERSON, ACTING SUPERVISOR

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: May 24, 1943

Citations

25 S.E.2d 745 (S.C. 1943)
25 S.E.2d 745

Citing Cases

Ex Parte: Moore v. Patterson

From this order both parties have appealed. The appeal of the petitioner is disposed of by the two recent…