From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Oregon State Bd. of Pharmacy

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 10, 1980
618 P.2d 1003 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

CA 18093

Argued and submitted October 3, 1980

Remanded November 10, 1980

Judicial Review from Oregon State Board of Pharmacy.

Barry O. Lane, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James M. Brown, Attorney General, John R. McCulloch, Jr., Solicitor General, and William F. Gary, Deputy Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Remanded.


In this judicial review proceeding the briefs demonstrated considerable confusion about just who did what and to whom. The record is not much help, and counsel for the agency, try as he might, was not successful in relieving the gloom. Petitioner requests that we appoint a master under ORS 183.482(7), but we are doubtful that that would help. Instead, we find that "the correctness of the action may have been impaired by a material error in procedure or a failure to follow prescribed procedure" and remand for further agency action. ORS 183.482(7).

Remanded.


Summaries of

Nichols v. Oregon State Bd. of Pharmacy

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 10, 1980
618 P.2d 1003 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Nichols v. Oregon State Bd. of Pharmacy

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLS, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 10, 1980

Citations

618 P.2d 1003 (Or. Ct. App. 1980)
618 P.2d 1003

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Board of Pharmacy

On appeal, this court remanded the matter to the Board for further agency action. Nichols v. Board of…