From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 2, 1994
632 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Summary

reversing a final order granting defendant's motion to enforce oral settlement agreement

Summary of this case from Orchid Island Prop. v. W.G. Mills

Opinion

No. 93-1117.

March 2, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, for Palm Beach County; John D. Wessel, Judge.

Charles Wender, Smith, Smith Wender, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Mark B. Kleinfeld, Jones, Foster, Johnston Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse a final order granting defendant's motion to enforce an oral settlement agreement.

It is clear from our examination of the record that the terms of a letter to be written by Appellee were an essential element of the settlement discussion. The record does not support a conclusion that Appellant's attorney agreed to the terms imposed.

The attorney's authority to settle is not disputed.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and RAMIREZ, JUAN, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 2, 1994
632 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

reversing a final order granting defendant's motion to enforce oral settlement agreement

Summary of this case from Orchid Island Prop. v. W.G. Mills
Case details for

Nichols v. May Department Stores Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOAN G. NICHOLS, APPELLANT, v. THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, D/B/A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 2, 1994

Citations

632 So. 2d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Orchid Island Prop. v. W.G. Mills

There is authority for treating an order compelling a settlement agreement as an appealable order. See…

Nastasi v. Thomas

Thomas filed a cross-appeal as to the January 25 order.Nastasi contends in his brief that we have…