From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. Hardegree

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 27, 1918
79 So. 598 (Ala. 1918)

Opinion

7 Div. 845.

June 27, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.

Lackey Rowland, of Ashland, for appellant. Merrill Cornelius, of Ashland, for appellee.


The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. (20 South. iv); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank, 156 Ala. 666, 46 So. 751; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co., 194 Ala. 175, 69 So. 601; Kinnon v. L. N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 So. 397; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345, 56 So. 809; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 So. 594.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nichols v. Hardegree

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 27, 1918
79 So. 598 (Ala. 1918)
Case details for

Nichols v. Hardegree

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLS v. HARDEGREE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 27, 1918

Citations

79 So. 598 (Ala. 1918)
202 Ala. 132

Citing Cases

Williams v. Ensley Motor Co.

This motion must of necessity be granted. Rule 1 Sup. Court Practice, Code 1907, p. 1506. The failure of…

Wetzel v. Hobbs

Precision is of the essence of this rule of practice. Kinnon v. Louisville N. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 481, 65…