From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nible v. Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 23, 2012
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01716-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01716-BAM PC

03-23-2012

WILLIAM NIBLE, Plaintiff, v. E. FLORES, Defendant.


ORDER VACATING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM FOR WILLIAM NIBLE

Plaintiff William Nible ("Plaintiff") is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendant E. Flores for violation of the First Amendment right to receive mail. The matter is set for jury trial on March 27, 2012 before the undersigned.

On March 22, 2012, Defendants' counsel filed a declaration, stating that Plaintiff had been in communication with counsel and had indicated his intent to dismiss this action with prejudice. Terhorst Decl. ¶ 2, Doc. 104. Based on this representation to the Court, trial is not necessary in this action, and Plaintiff's presence is not required. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for William Nible, CDCR No. P45257, issued February 27, 2012, is vacated; and
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to fax a copy of this order to the litigation coordinator where Plaintiff is incarcerated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Nible v. Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 23, 2012
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01716-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Nible v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM NIBLE, Plaintiff, v. E. FLORES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:06-cv-01716-BAM PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2012)