From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nibbelink v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 7, 2020
292 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

No. 1D19-1866

02-07-2020

Jonathan B. NIBBELINK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Jonathan B. Nibbelink, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan B. Nibbelink, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Ray, C.J., and Rowe and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.

Summaries of

Nibbelink v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 7, 2020
292 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Nibbelink v. State

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN B. NIBBELINK, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 7, 2020

Citations

292 So. 3d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)