From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NIA v. ADAMS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 13, 2011
1:08-cv-0520-AWI-DLB-PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)

Opinion

1:08-cv-0520-AWI-DLB-PC.

January 13, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED WITNESSES (Doc. #45)


Plaintiff Aasim Nia ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Trial is currently set for February 22, 2010.

In this action, Plaintiff contends that Defendant Derral Adams violated his equal protection rights. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant maintained a policy that allowed non-affiliated African American inmates to be housed with gang affiliated inmates but did not require non-affiliated Hispanic inmates to be housed with gang affiliated inmates. Plaintiff alleges that this policy forced non-affiliated African American inmates celled with gang affiliated inmates to be placed on lock down anytime gang affiliated inmates were on lock down, However, because non-affiliated Hispanic inmates were never housed with gang affiliated inmates, non-affiliated Hispanic inmates were never on lock down when gang affiliated inmates were on lockdown.

On December 9, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting the court order Inmate Edward Saddler, CDCR # K81618 and Inmate Dante Craig, CDCR # T78833 be transported to court for trial. Plaintiff's motion provides evidence that both Mr. Saddler and Mr. Craig are willing to testify at trial, and Plaintiff's declaration has been attached to Plaintiff's motion. Both Mr. Saddler and Mr. Craig will testify that they were housed at Kern Valley State Prison with Plaintiff during the relevant time frame. Both Mr. Saddler and Mr. Craig will testify about what they observed concerning housing arrangements and offer their opinions that there was an unwritten policy to not house non-affiliated Hispanic inmates with affiliated Hispanic inmates. Defendant has not opposed either Mr. Saddler's or Mr. Craig's being brought to court to testify.

The court will grant Plaintiff's motion at this time. Mr. Saddler and Mr. Craig have testimony that is relevant to the issues in this action. Both can testify concerning their observations about housing. They also may offer their opinions on housing policies if their opinions fall within Rule 701 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. As such, the court will order a writs for Mr. Saddler and Mr. Craig Mr. Logan.

Accordingly, the court ORDERS that

1. Plaintiff's motion for Inmate Edward Saddler, CDCR # K81618 and Inmate Dante Craig, CDCR # T78833 to be transferred for trial is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on:
Edward Saddler, CDCR #K81618
Kern Valley State Prison
3000 West Cecil Ave.
Delano, CA 93215
Dante Craig, CDCR #T78833
Kern Valley State Prison
3000 West Cecil Ave.
Delano, CA 93215
3. The court will issue a writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 13, 2011


Summaries of

NIA v. ADAMS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 13, 2011
1:08-cv-0520-AWI-DLB-PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)
Case details for

NIA v. ADAMS

Case Details

Full title:AASIM NIA, Plaintiff, v. DERRAL ADAMS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

1:08-cv-0520-AWI-DLB-PC (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2011)