Moreover, the jury was also instructed, inter alia, about the presumption of Clark's innocence, the State's burden of proof, and the elements of the crimes of malice murder and felony murder. See Nguyen v. State , 279 Ga.App. 129, 133 (5) (b), 630 S.E.2d 636 (2006) (in circumstances in which jury was properly instructed on the elements of rape and the State's burden of proof, trial counsel's failure to file motion in limine to prevent State and its witnesses from using term "rape" during rape trial did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel). Furthermore, this Court has rejected the claim that a defendant is denied a fair trial because witnesses use the term "murder" during their testimony.
Proof of venue is sufficient where the State has submitted a map of the crime scene area into evidence and presented testimony that the crime occurred on a street located in the county in which the defendant is being prosecuted. Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50 (3) ( 302 SE2d 555) (1983); Nguyen v. State, 279 Ga. App. 129 (2) ( 630 SE2d 636) (2006). Here, eyewitnesses to the incident consistently stated the shooting took place in the Allgood Terrace "circle" or cul-de-sac.
Moreover, the RICO charges in this case were based on fraud, and Weidman does not assert that the jury was not properly charged on the issues. See also Clark v. State , 300 Ga. 899, 902 (2) (a), 799 S.E.2d 202 (2017) (in light of proper jury instructions, trial counsel's failure to file motion in limine to prevent State and its witnesses from using term "murder" during murder trial did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel); Nguyen v. State , 279 Ga. App. 129, 133 (5) (b), 630 S.E.2d 636 (2006) (same for term "rape"). 5. Failure to charge jury on sole defense . Weidman also asserts that the trial court erred in failing to give her requested jury charge on mistake of fact as it represented her sole defense.
See Nguyen v. State.Nguyen v. State, 279 Ga. App. 129, 133 (5) (a) ( 630 SE2d 636) (2006). (b) Mikell contends that his trial counsel failed to meet with him an adequate number of times or review discovery with him, which would have led to an alibi defense.