Opinion
8:21-cv-01775-JVS (ADSx)
01-03-2024
AARON NGUYEN, NGOC LE THI PHAN, AND HOANG MINH NGUYEN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, MARK LORD, MICHAEL REYNOLDS, SERGEANT MIKE MARTIN, AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants.
COURTROOM 10C
JUDGMENT [164]
HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
On December 11, 2023, Defendant CITY OF GARDEN GROVE's (“City”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 70) on the Monell claim in Count 2 of the Second Amended Complaint, Defendants MARK LORD, MICHAEL REYNOLDS, and SERGEANT MIKE MARTIN's (“Officers”) motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 75) on the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim and supervisory liability claim in the Second Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs AARON NGUYEN, NGOC LE THI PHAN, and HOANG MINH NGUYEN's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. 73) against Defendant Lord came before the Court. After consideration of all arguments and evidence submitted in support of and in opposition to the motions, and all evidentiary objections submitted, the Court entered an Order on December 19, 2023 (Dkt. 163) GRANTING the City's motion for summary judgment, GRANTING the Officers' motion for summary judgment, and DENYING Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment.
NOW, THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, MARK LORD, MICHAEL REYNOLDS, and SERGEANT MIKE MARTIN and against Plaintiffs AARON NGUYEN, NGOC LE THI PHAN, and HOANG MINH NGUYEN. Defendants CITY OF GARDEN GROVE, MARK LORD, MICHAEL REYNOLDS, and SERGEANT MIKE MARTIN shall be entitled to recover costs as permitted by law and according to proof.