From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NGUYEN v. BICK

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 28, 2009
No. 2:08-cv-2983 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-2983 JAM JFM (PC).

May 28, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 5, 2009 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

NGUYEN v. BICK

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 28, 2009
No. 2:08-cv-2983 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2009)
Case details for

NGUYEN v. BICK

Case Details

Full title:TRI NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH BICK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 28, 2009

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-2983 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2009)