From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nguyen v. Bartos

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1461 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1461 WBS KJN P.

April 29, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's April 20, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 28) is denied.

DATED: April 28, 2011


Summaries of

Nguyen v. Bartos

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1461 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Nguyen v. Bartos

Case Details

Full title:TRI D. NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. BARTOS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1461 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2011)