Opinion
Argued February 11, 1985
Decided March 19, 1985
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alan Saks, J.
Robert J. Poulson for appellant.
Norman L. Rosenthal for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Bentley Kassal at the Appellate Division ( 102 A.D.2d 388) to which we add only that plaintiff's attempt in this court to characterize the services it rendered as outside the scope of Real Property Law § 442-d is inconsistent with the allegation in its amended complaint that it earned its claimed commission by "procuring a purchaser for the Property".
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.