From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

NexusCard, Inc. v. Kroger Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2017
2016-2074 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2074 2016-2077

05-09-2017

NEXUSCARD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. KROGER CO., Defendant-Appellee

ADAM BAUMLI, Baumli Law Firm PLLC, Dallas, TX, for plaintiff-appellant. WILLIAM P. ATKINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRIAN CHRISTOPHER NASH, Austin, TX.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:15-cv-00961-JRG, 2:15-cv-00968-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

ADAM BAUMLI, Baumli Law Firm PLLC, Dallas, TX, for plaintiff-appellant. WILLIAM P. ATKINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRIAN CHRISTOPHER NASH, Austin, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 9, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

NexusCard, Inc. v. Kroger Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2017
2016-2074 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)
Case details for

NexusCard, Inc. v. Kroger Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEXUSCARD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. KROGER CO., Defendant-Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 9, 2017

Citations

2016-2074 (Fed. Cir. May. 9, 2017)