Nextrade Holdings, Inc. v. Protrader Group LP

Full title: NEXTRADE HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. PROTRADER…

Court: United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Apr 7, 2006

Case No. 8:03-CV-166-T-30-MAP (M.D. Fla. Apr. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 8:03-CV-166-T-30-MAP.

April 7, 2006

ORDER

MARK PIZZO, Magistrate Judge

Before the Court is Nextrade's motion to enforce protective order and motion for entry of sanctions (doc. 231) and ProTrader Defendants' response thereto (doc. 234). Essentially, Nextrade contends that counsel for the ProTrader Defendants violated the protective order previously entered in this case (doc. 25) by providing copies of documents designated as confidential to a Seattle attorney who filed them in a Northern District of California case and paraphrased them in a related case filed in this Court. In response, the ProTrader Defendants acknowledge their disclosure, argue it was inadvertent, and challenge the "confidential" designation given to the documents. After consideration, Nextrade's motion to enforce the protective order and for sanctions is DENIED.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Nextrade's motion to enforce protective order and for entry of sanctions (doc. 231) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.