Nextg v. City of Huntington Beach

Full title: NEXTG NETWORKS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

294 F. App'x 303 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-55403.

Argued and Submitted September 12, 2008.

Filed September 23, 2008.

William F. Bly, Esquire, Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, T. Scott Thompson, Esquire, John R. Eastburg, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Washington, DC, Robert L. Delsman, Esquire, Nextg Networks Inc., San Jose, CA, Patrick S. Ryan, Esquire, PSR Law Firm LLC, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Scott F. Field, Esquire, Jennifer McGrath, Esquire, City Attorney's Office, Huntington Beach, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 07-CV-01471-ABC.

Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and SANDOVAL^_, District Judge.

_ The Honorable Brian Sandoval, U.S. District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM^__

__ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The City of Huntington Beach, California appeals two preliminary injunctions entered by the district court in this case.

We vacate the injunctions and remand to the district court for further consideration in light of our recent decision in Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San Diego, 543 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc), reversing City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp., 260 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2001).

VACATED AND REMANDED.