From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nexrf Corp. v. Playtika Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 13, 2022
No. 2021-2147 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2147 2021-2219

05-13-2022

NEXRF CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant v. PLAYTIKA LTD., PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP., CAESARS INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT Defendants-Appellees NEXRF CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant v. ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY. LTD., PRODUCT MADNESS INC, BIG FISH GAMES, INC., Defendants-Appellees

Eugene LeDonne, Haug Partners LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant NexRF Corp. Also represented by Jonathan Herstoff; Christopher Gosselin, Washington, DC. Erika Arner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Playtika Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp. also represented by Forrest Alexander Jones, Andrea Grace Klock Mills, Gerson Panitch, Christina Ji-Hye Yang. Ricardo Bonilla, Fish & Richardson PC, Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee Caesars Interactive Entertainment. Also represented by Neil J. McNabnay, Lance E. Wyatt, Jr. Richard L. Rainey, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Aristocrat International Pty. Ltd., Product Madness Inc, Big Fish Games, Inc. Also represented by Gary Rubman, Peter Andrew Swanson.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 3:20-cv-00603-MMD-CLB, Judge Miranda M. Du.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:21-cv-00798-RSM, Judge Ri-cardo S. Martinez.

Eugene LeDonne, Haug Partners LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant NexRF Corp. Also represented by Jonathan Herstoff; Christopher Gosselin, Washington, DC.

Erika Arner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Playtika Ltd., Playtika Holding Corp. also represented by Forrest Alexander Jones, Andrea Grace Klock Mills, Gerson Panitch, Christina Ji-Hye Yang.

Ricardo Bonilla, Fish & Richardson PC, Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee Caesars Interactive Entertainment. Also represented by Neil J. McNabnay, Lance E. Wyatt, Jr.

Richard L. Rainey, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Aristocrat International Pty. Ltd., Product Madness Inc, Big Fish Games, Inc. Also represented by Gary Rubman, Peter Andrew Swanson.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

PER CURIAM

Lourie, Mayer, and Chen, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Nexrf Corp. v. Playtika Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
May 13, 2022
No. 2021-2147 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Nexrf Corp. v. Playtika Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:NEXRF CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant v. PLAYTIKA LTD., PLAYTIKA HOLDING CORP.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 13, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-2147 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2022)

Citing Cases

Beteiro, LLC v. DraftKings Inc.

Notable, but not authoritative, is the fact that we have non-precedentially affirmed several district court…