From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newtown Square E., L.P. v. Twp. of Newtown

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 25, 2013
No. 80 MAL 2012 (Pa. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 80 MAL 2012

03-25-2013

NEWTOWN SQUARE EAST, L.P., Petitioner v. TOWNSHIP OF NEWTOWN, Respondent BPG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS-STRAW PARTY-1, L.P., BPG REAL ESTATE INVESTORS-STRAW PARTY-II, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS OFFICE B, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS 25, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS 1 BUILDING, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS H BUILDING, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS D BUILDING, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS COTTAGES, L.P., CAMPUS INVESTORS OFFICE 2B, L.P., ELLIS PRESERVE OWNERS ASSOC. INC., KELLY PRESERVE OWNERS ASSOC. INC., COTTAGES AT ELLIS OWNERS ASSOC. INC., GENBER/MANAGEMENT CAMPUS LLC, BERWIND PROPERTY GROUP LTD., EXECUTIVE BENEFIT PARTNERSHIP CAMPUS L.P., MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP-BENEFIT AND ELLIS ACQUISITION L.P., Intervenors


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Did the Commonwealth Court err in holding that the Tentative Plan complies with the PRD Ordinance and the MPC when the Tentative Plan fails to reveal the use of buildings, as required by a valid PRD Ordinance and by the MPC?


Summaries of

Newtown Square E., L.P. v. Twp. of Newtown

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Mar 25, 2013
No. 80 MAL 2012 (Pa. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Newtown Square E., L.P. v. Twp. of Newtown

Case Details

Full title:NEWTOWN SQUARE EAST, L.P., Petitioner v. TOWNSHIP OF NEWTOWN, Respondent…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

No. 80 MAL 2012 (Pa. Mar. 25, 2013)