From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newton v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Aug 19, 2003
113 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Nos. ED 82252, ED 82523

August 19, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Margaret M. Neill.

Daniel E. Wilke, Wilke Wilke, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Michael R. Gibbons, Gibbons, Gibbons Howard, P.C., Kirkwood, MO, for respondent.

Before Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


Defendant, Michael Taylor, appeals the trial court's judgment denying his motion to set aside a default judgment. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo.banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J. concurring.


Summaries of

Newton v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Aug 19, 2003
113 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Newton v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:LINDA ANDERSON NEWTON, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. MICHAEL K. TAYLOR…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Aug 19, 2003

Citations

113 S.W.3d 244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.

Therefore, when a party's Rule 74.05(d) motion to set aside a default judgment is filed after the underlying…