From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newton v. Locklear

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 25, 2024
1:22cv388 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2024)

Opinion

1:22cv388

03-25-2024

JAMES EARL NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. DEAN LOCKLEAR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs United States District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on February 23, 2024, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 40, 41). No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636.

Recommended Ruling was sent in paper form from the Clerk's Office addressed to Daniel Marroquin-Santiago, 43831208, Yazoo City Medium, Federal Correctional Institution, Yazoo City, MS. Envelope marked “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward” is dated March 11, 2019.

The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's “Motion for Summary Judgment”, (ECF No. 28), is DENIED without prejudice; and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment”, (ECF No. 32), is DENIED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Newton v. Locklear

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 25, 2024
1:22cv388 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Newton v. Locklear

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EARL NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. DEAN LOCKLEAR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 25, 2024

Citations

1:22cv388 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 25, 2024)