From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newton v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Aug 28, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-308 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-308

08-28-2019

RONALD NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. LORIE DAVIS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Ronald Newton, a prisoner confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Lorie Davis, the Board of Pardons and Paroles, Rachel Alderett, and Pam Corey.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends denying plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. Plaintiff contends that one of his previous lawsuits was wrongly decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. However, that judgment is final, and this is not the appropriate venue to attack the correctness of that judgment.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections (#10) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#8) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 28th day of August, 2019.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Newton v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Aug 28, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-308 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Newton v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:RONALD NEWTON, Plaintiff, v. LORIE DAVIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Aug 28, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-308 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 28, 2019)