Opinion
Civil Action No.: 2:18-cv-249
08-15-2019
ASMAR NAFIS NEWSOME, Petitioner, v. J. RAY ORMOND, Warden, Respondent.
FINAL ORDER
Before the Court is a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, ECF No. 1, and the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition. ECF No. 11. In his Petition, the pro se Petitioner argues that he was given a three (3) level enhancement under § 3B1.1(b), application of which he argues was proper at the time of his sentence but is now improper following the Fourth Circuit decision in United States v. Slade, 631 F.3d 185 (4th Cir. 2011).
The Petition was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Civil Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed July 1, 2019, recommends Dismissal of the Petition with prejudice. ECF No. 15. On July 11, 2019, the Petitioner timely filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Respondent has not responded to the Petitioner's objections and the time to do so has expired.
The Court, having reviewed the record and examined the objections filed by Petitioner to the Report and Recommendation, and having made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby ADOPT and APPROVE the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed July 1, 2019. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 11, be GRANTED, and that the Petition, ECF No. 1, be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent.
Finding that the basis for dismissal of Petitioner's § 2241 petition is not debatable, and alternatively finding that Petitioner has not made a ''substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); see Rules Gov. § 2254 Cases in U.S. Dist. Cts. 11(a); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-85 (2000).
Petitioner is ADVISED that because a certificate of appealability is denied by this Court, he may seek a certificate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Fed. Rule App. Proc. 22(b); Rules Gov. § 2254 Cases in U.S. Dist. Cts. 11(a). If Petitioner intends to seek a certificate of appealability from the Fourth Circuit, he must do so within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner may seek such a certificate by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse. 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510.
The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Final Order to Petitioner and to counsel of record for the Respondent.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/_________
ROBERT G. DOUMAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE August , 2019