From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newsome v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
Case No: C 09-5288 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No: C 09-5288 SBA

03-21-2013

PETER NEWSOME AND STEPHANIE NEWSOME, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. DBA AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., BANKERS ALLIANCE INC., JULIE WHITESIDE, and DOES 1-20, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION OF

MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Dkt. 121, 136, 148

The Court previously referred Plaintiffs' Second Application for Default Judgment (Dkt. 121) and Julie Whiteside's pro se Motion to Set Aside Default (Dkt. 136) to Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas ("the Magistrate") for a report and recommendation. (Dkt. 122, 139.)

On February 28, 2013, the Magistrate issued a report and recommendation in which he recommended that: "(1) Whiteside's motion to set aside entry of default be granted; (2) Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Julie Whiteside be denied; and (3) Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Bankers' Alliance be denied without prejudice." (Dkt. 148 at 1.)

Any objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within fourteen days of receipt thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Civ. L.R. 72-2, 72-3. The district court must "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objection is made," and "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Civ. L.R. 72-3(a) (requiring that any objections be accompanied by a motion for de novo determination). The deadline to file an objection to the report and recommendation was March 14, 2013. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1), 72(b). To date, no objections have been filed in this case.

In the absence of a timely objection, the Court "need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Advisory Committee Notes (1983) (citing Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974)); see also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) ("The statute [28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)] makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if [an] objection is made, but not otherwise.") (en banc). The Court has reviewed the record on its face and finds no clear error. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Dkt. 148) is ACCEPTED and shall become the Order of this Court. Thus, Defendant Julie Whiteside's motion to set aside entry of default is GRANTED; Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Julie Whiteside is DENIED; and (3) Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Bankers' Alliance is DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate Docket 121, 136 and 148.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

United States District Judge
PETER AND STEPHANIE NEWSOM et al, Plaintiff,

v.
COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC et al, Defendant.

Case Number: CV09-05288 SBA


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 21, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Julie Whiteside
1212 Sterns Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90035

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Newsome v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
Case No: C 09-5288 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Newsome v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PETER NEWSOME AND STEPHANIE NEWSOME, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

Case No: C 09-5288 SBA (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)