From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newsome v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 14, 2021
No. 9658-21 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 14, 2021)

Opinion

9658-21

12-14-2021

Birdella Newsome Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Maurice B. Foley Chief Judge

On September 30, 2021, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that the petition was not executed or filed by a fiduciary or personal representative duly appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction and legally entitled to institute a case on behalf of Birdella Newsome, Deceased, or her estate. The underlying petition in this deficiency case for the 2018 taxable year had been submitted on behalf of the decedent by Samantha Cox. In the motion, respondent indicated that Samantha Cox has no objection to the granting thereof.

The burden of proving that the Court has jurisdiction is on the taxpayer, and unless the petition is filed by the taxpayer or someone lawfully authorized to act on his or her behalf, the Court lacks jurisdiction. Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348 (1975).

The premises considered, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Newsome v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Dec 14, 2021
No. 9658-21 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Newsome v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Birdella Newsome Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Dec 14, 2021

Citations

No. 9658-21 (U.S.T.C. Dec. 14, 2021)