Additionally, although no Texas case seems to have come out and said so directly, depreciated value logically reflects fair market value in a theft prosecution. Cf. Newsom v. State, No. 03-21-00694-CR, 2022 WL 3649625, at *4 &n.2 (Tex. App.- Austin Aug. 25, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (reversing criminal-mischief conviction for destroying a tire of certain alleged minimum fair market value where State proved only replacement value, and noting there was "no evidence of how to calculate the depreciation of tires, thus there is no evidence of the fair market value of the tire when destroyed"; "[e]ven if the jury could use its common knowledge to calculate a linear rate of depreciation of value based on the use of the first set of tires on the vehicle, the replacement cost does not provide legally sufficient evidence to support a depreciated fair market value of at least $100").