From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newport v. Newport

Supreme Court, New York County
Apr 11, 1928
131 Misc. 851 (N.Y. Misc. 1928)

Opinion

April 11, 1928.

Walradt Blaney [ Charles P. Blaney of counsel], for the plaintiff.

Edgar I. Ahrwaler, for the defendant.


Defendant cannot avail himself of the existence of the separation agreement which he has concededly failed to perform. Plaintiff's institution of this action for a separation in which she asked for and obtained temporary alimony amounted to a repudiation of the agreement and an election to rescind the same. (See Landes v. Landes, 172 A.D. 758; Randolph v. Field, 165 id. 279.)

Judgment will be for plaintiff, with twenty-five dollars per week alimony. Defendant's motions to dismiss the complaint, upon which decision was reserved, are denied, with exceptions. Submit findings.


Summaries of

Newport v. Newport

Supreme Court, New York County
Apr 11, 1928
131 Misc. 851 (N.Y. Misc. 1928)
Case details for

Newport v. Newport

Case Details

Full title:ROSALIND P. NEWPORT, Plaintiff, v. HARRY M. NEWPORT, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Apr 11, 1928

Citations

131 Misc. 851 (N.Y. Misc. 1928)
228 N.Y.S. 313

Citing Cases

Nilsson v. Nilsson

"It is well settled that a husband cannot invoke a separation agreement as a bar to a separation action in…

Nilsson v. Nilsson

"It is well settled that a husband cannot invoke a separation agreement as a bar to a separation action in…