From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newmark v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1954
284 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)

Opinion

November 30, 1954.

Present — Dore, J.P., Callahan, Bastow, Botein and Bergan, JJ.


The first three of the five partnership agreements referred to in the complaint contain provision for the submission of all disputes to arbitration; the last two agreements do not contain such arbitration provision. It would seem that defendant Harris should be entitled to a complaint separately stating and numbering the causes of action based on violations under each of the separate partnership agreements between the parties. It is difficult and impractical, as a matter of pleading to assert a defense based on a right to arbitrate with respect to part of one cause of action. Order unanimously reversed and the motion to separately state and number granted, with $20 costs to the appellant.


Summaries of

Newmark v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1954
284 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)
Case details for

Newmark v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:SAUL NEWMARK, Respondent, v. DAVID A. HARRIS, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1954

Citations

284 App. Div. 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1954)