From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Washington Mutual Home Loans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1780 KJM DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1780 KJM DAD.

August 22, 2011


ORDER


This matter comes before the court upon defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank's (erroneously sued as Washington Mutual Home Loans) motion to dismiss, filed on July 13, 2011. (ECF 5.) Plaintiff has not filed and served an opposition or statement of non-opposition at least fourteen days preceding the hearing date of August 31, 2011 as required by Local Rule 230(c).

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order, to show cause: 1) why sanctions should not be imposed against her or her counsel for failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c) and 2) why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The August 31, 2011 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss is hereby VACATED, to be reset if the court determines a hearing is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Newman v. Washington Mutual Home Loans

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1780 KJM DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Newman v. Washington Mutual Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:SHARI NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL HOME LOANS, d/b/a Chase Home…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1780 KJM DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)