From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. State of California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 9, 1950
185 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 12423.

November 9, 1950.

Emil Newman, in pro. per.

Dion R. Holm, City Atty., Thomas M. O'Connor, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees City County of San Francisco and Elmer E. Robinson.

Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen. State of Cal., Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees State of Cal., Fred N. Howser and J. Hession.

Before STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.


Heretofore this court dismissed the appeal in the above entitled case upon the ground that no judgment had ever been entered in the case by a court. Thereafter we denied a petition for rehearing. We now have before us another petition for a rehearing with no change in the record. Petitioner is a layman acting for himself and seems not to understand that there must be a judgment, and not merely a statement that a judgment will be made and entered, before we can entertain an appeal. If and when a judgment is entered and an appeal is properly taken we shall of course entertain and decide the appeal.

Cause was ordered dismissed August 22, 1950.

Rehearing was denied October 2, 1950.

Rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Newman v. State of California

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 9, 1950
185 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1950)
Case details for

Newman v. State of California

Case Details

Full title:NEWMAN v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 9, 1950

Citations

185 F.2d 392 (9th Cir. 1950)

Citing Cases

United States v. State of Arizona

The United States Attorney had the same erroneous concept that such an order is appealable as the fourteen…

Newman v. State of California

Rehearing Denied October 2, 1950. See 185 F.2d 392. Emil Newman, in…