From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 26, 1989
384 S.E.2d 670 (Ga. 1989)

Opinion

S89A0199.

DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1989.

Murder, etc. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Alexander.

Michael T. McClain, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Richard E. Hicks, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Leonora Grant, for appellee.


James Love Newman was convicted of murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder and five years on the firearm charge. He appeals. We affirm.

The crime occurred on May 17, 1988. Appellant was indicted on August 30, 1988. He was convicted of murder on December 7, 1988 and sentenced to life imprisonment the same day. Appellant filed a motion for new trial on January 4, 1989; the motion was denied on April 28, 1989. The notice of appeal was filed May 26, 1989. The case was docketed in this court June 29, 1989. The case was submitted for decision without oral argument on August 11, 1989.

Evidence presented at trial showed that Newman and his estranged wife, Doris Eppinger, argued over sex and money. As the argument increased in intensity, Eppinger ran up the stairs. Newman pursued her, firing his handgun five times. Eppinger's two teenage children were in the house and heard the argument and shots fired. Newman left the house looking sick. Shortly thereafter he voluntarily surrendered himself and the gun to the police, saying he wanted to turn himself in because he had murdered his wife. Medical evidence showed that Eppinger suffered multiple gunshot wounds and died of a gunshot wound to her chest. Ballistics testimony identified Newman's gun as the murder weapon.

1. In his first enumeration of error, Newman complains that certain evidence of "prior difficulties" between himself and Eppinger was erroneously admitted. We find no error. See Hales v. State, 250 Ga. 112 ( 296 S.E.2d 577) (1982). However, even if there were error in admitting this evidence, the overwhelming evidence of guilt renders that error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Minter v. State, 258 Ga. 629 ( 373 S.E.2d 359) (1988); Johnson v. State, 238 Ga. 59 ( 230 S.E.2d 869) (1976).

2. Newman next contends that the evidence does not support the verdict. As we have already noted, the evidence against Newman was overwhelming. It would authorize a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.C. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 26, 1989.


Summaries of

Newman v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Oct 26, 1989
384 S.E.2d 670 (Ga. 1989)
Case details for

Newman v. State

Case Details

Full title:NEWMAN v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Oct 26, 1989

Citations

384 S.E.2d 670 (Ga. 1989)
384 S.E.2d 670

Citing Cases

Wilson v. State

While we hold that giving this charge was error, the error was harmless due to the overwhelming evidence…