From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Rogers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Sep 18, 1930
139 Misc. 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)

Opinion

September 18, 1930.

William A. Blank, for the appellant.

Jacob I. Wiener, for the respondent.


Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below. The contract of employment of defendant's twelve-year-old child is against public policy and illegal under section 485, subdivision 3, of the Penal Law, and cannot be enforced. ( Albera v. Sciaretti, 72 Misc. 496; People v. Meade, 24 Abb. N.C. 357; People v. Ewer, 141 N.Y. 129.) It is not necessary for the statute in terms to provide that contracts made in violation of it are void. The statute makes such contracts against public policy, and the courts will declare them to be void. ( Thatcher v. Morris, 11 N.Y. 437; Coverly v. Terminal Warehouse Co., 85 A.D. 488; affd., 178 N.Y. 602; Sirkin v. Fourteenth St. Store, 124 A.D. 384.)

All concur; present, CROPSEY, McCRATE and LEWIS, JJ.


Summaries of

Newman v. Rogers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Sep 18, 1930
139 Misc. 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
Case details for

Newman v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. AGNES ROGERS, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Sep 18, 1930

Citations

139 Misc. 795 (N.Y. App. Term 1930)
248 N.Y.S. 297