From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Nat'l Transfer Ctr. Mgmt. Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Oct 20, 2023
Civil Action 22-00278-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-00278-BAJ-RLB

10-20-2023

MEGAN NEWMAN v. NATIONAL TRANSFER CENTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC


RULING AND ORDER

BRIANA. JACKSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT.

Megan Newman, as Curatrix on behalf of Kathryn Carline, (“Plaintiff”) initiated this negligence and medical malpractice action in the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana (“Nineteenth JDC”), seeking damages allegedly resulting from a series of errors and omissions occurring during the course of Ms. Carline's medical transport from Lakeview Regional Medical Center in Covington, Louisiana to Tulane University Medical Center in New Orleans. At the time Plaintiff filed her original petition, she named only National Transfer Center Management Services, LLC (“National Transfer”) as a defendant because, under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act, La R.S. 40:1231.1, et seq., her claims against any other potential defendants were required to be presented to a medical review panel first.

Being the only Defendant at the time, and being diverse from Plaintiff (who is a Louisiana citizen), National Transfer removed Plaintiff's action to this District, invoking diversity jurisdiction. Thereafter, the Court stayed these proceedings pending the result of the medical review panel's inquiry, in part to determine if a basis existed to add any additional defendants to this action. On April 6, 2023, the medical review panel concluded its review of Plaintiff's claims, determining (among other things) that “miscommunications” occurred between National Transfer and various other parties during the course of Plaintiff's transport.

Now, Plaintiff seeks to amend her complaint to add those defendants whose actions were the subject of the panel's review. (Doc. 15). Many (possibly all) of these proposed defendants are also Louisiana citizens, which would destroy diversity (and require remand) if amendment is allowed. (See Doc. 15-3 at ¶¶ 2-7). The Magistrate Judge has issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21, the “Report”), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion To Amend be granted and that, in turn, this action be remanded to the Nineteenth JDC. National Transfer's deadline to object to the Report has passed, without any objection.

Having carefully considered Plaintiff's Motion, National Transfer's opposition, National Transfer's notice of removal, and the underlying state court record, the Court APPROVES the Report and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion To Amend Petition (Doc. 15) be and is hereby GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's proposed First Amended Petition For Damages (Doc. 15-3) shall be entered into the record and shall supersede the original petition as the operative pleading in this action.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, there no longer being diversity among the parties due to the addition of multiple non-diverse defendants, and there no longer being any basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction over this matter, this action be and is hereby REMANDED immediately the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana for all further proceedings.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Newman v. Nat'l Transfer Ctr. Mgmt. Servs.

United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana
Oct 20, 2023
Civil Action 22-00278-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Newman v. Nat'l Transfer Ctr. Mgmt. Servs.

Case Details

Full title:MEGAN NEWMAN v. NATIONAL TRANSFER CENTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-00278-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Oct. 20, 2023)