Hall v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 295 N.W. at 207.Newman v. Jackson, 1943 OK 178, 192 Okla. 461, 138 P.2d 76, 77–78 (issue of the parties' intent concerning reasonable time to perform or terminate the contract was properly an issue for a jury to determine).Debary v. Harrah's Oper. Co., 465 F.Supp.2d 250, 261 (S.D.N.Y.2006) ("Third party beneficiary status is a question of fact, because the issue turns on whether the contracting parties intended their contract to directly benefit a third party."), aff'd, 547 F.3d 115 (2d Cir.2008).

Coryell v. Marrs, 180 Okla. 394, 70 P.2d 478, 479 [1937]; Campbell v. Smith, 106 Okla. 26, 232 P. 844, 846 [1925].Youngs v. Case, Okla., 341 P.2d 572, 577 [1959]; Newman v. Jackson, 192 Okla. 461, 138 P.2d 76, 77 [1943].Youngs v. Case, supra note 15; Twyford v. Sonken-Galamba Corporation, supra note 12.