From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newkirk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 16, 2005
898 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 4D04-236.

March 16, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Hubert R. Lindsey, J.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Fisher Zibura, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Mitchell Newkirk seeks reversal on direct appeal of his habitual felony offender sentence. As grounds, he argues that the evidence of his predicate convictions was insufficient because the state failed to offer expert fingerprint analysis. The state had a fingerprint expert ready to testify at the sentencing hearing; the only reason the state did not call its expert was because defense counsel indicated no fingerprint analysis was necessary.

We affirm Newkirk's sentence because defense counsel's conduct at the hearing was tantamount to a concession that no error occurred. This is, of course, without prejudice to Newkirk filing a 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

Affirmed.

STONE, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Newkirk v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 16, 2005
898 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Newkirk v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mitchell NEWKIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 16, 2005

Citations

898 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Newkirk v. State

Finally, he makes the curious claim that his trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal, but the state…