From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 26, 2011
No. 02-10-00411-CV (Tex. App. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

No. 02-10-00411-CV

Delivered: May 26, 2011.

Appealed from the 141st District Court of Tarrant County.

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On April 27, 2011, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 26, 2011
No. 02-10-00411-CV (Tex. App. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Newkirk v. Donnaley, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RORY NEWKIRK, APPELLANT v. DONNALEY, INC., L.L.C. D/B/A BELLADONNA SHOES…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

No. 02-10-00411-CV (Tex. App. May. 26, 2011)