From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newgold v. Woodstock Development Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 16, 1967
227 N.E.2d 886 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued April 18, 1967

Decided May 16, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, JOHN H. PENNOCK, J.

Herman N. Schwartz and Irving Ronald Storch for appellant.

Sidney J. Loeb and Benjamin Goldbaum for respondent.


Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Special Term with directions to grant defendant's motion for partial summary judgment in accordance with the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division. Question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

Newgold v. Woodstock Development Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 16, 1967
227 N.E.2d 886 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Newgold v. Woodstock Development Corporation

Case Details

Full title:GABRIEL A. NEWGOLD, Respondent, v. WOODSTOCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Also…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 16, 1967

Citations

227 N.E.2d 886 (N.Y. 1967)
227 N.E.2d 886
281 N.Y.S.2d 87

Citing Cases

Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Knox

The mortgage does not contain a provision for acceleration of the entire amount due upon nonpayment of a…

Oneida National Bank v. Kranz

sing from the lapse of time is applicable to every debt, no matter how solemn the instrument may be by which…