From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newell v. Woodward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

March, 1934.


Order reversed, on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Motion to dismiss complaint granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days after entry and service of copy of the order to be entered hereon, on the ground that the allegation in the complaint that the "defendants so negligently, recklessly and carelessly managed, maintained and operated said premises, dance hall, amusement park and parking space, that the plaintiff was caused to fall into a ravine and as a result thereof the plaintiff sustained serious and permanent injuries as hereinafter set forth" does not plead facts. The negligence under such an allegation might consist of any one of a wide variety of acts. ( Pagnillo v. Mack Paving Construction Co., 142 App. Div. 491. ) Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Newell v. Woodward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Newell v. Woodward

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD B. NEWELL, Respondent, v. CLYDE WOODWARD and Others, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Wylie v. Stevens

Appeal from an order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint wherein it is alleged in substance…

Turner v. Craney

Negligence under such an allegation may consist of any one of a wide variety of acts. Sufficient facts are…