From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1994
210 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 13, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.).


Plaintiff failed to offer proof sufficient to rebut defendants' showing that because of the absence of past criminal acts, the attack on plaintiff on the 16th floor of the premises was not foreseeable (Grignoli v New York City Hous. Auth., 196 A.D.2d 525).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1994
210 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Newell v. Swiss Reassurance Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES NEWELL, Appellant, v. SWISS REASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 83 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 950

Citing Cases

Karp v. Saks Fifth Avenue

In order to establish foreseeability, one need not show that the criminal conduct is of the same type ( see,…