From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

October 6, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Yates County, Purple, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ. (Order entered Aug. 24, 1989.)


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly determined that the nominating petitions of appellant Hull were invalid upon the ground that the subscribing witnesses failed to indicate the assembly district of their residence (Election Law § 6-132; Matter of Higby v Mahoney, 48 N.Y.2d 15).

We have reviewed the other issues raised on appeal and find them to be without merit.


Summaries of

Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 6, 1989
154 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Newcomb v. Fitzpatrick

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE H. NEWCOMB, Respondent, v. ROBERT J. FITZPATRICK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1989

Citations

154 A.D.2d 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
546 N.Y.S.2d 43