From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newberry v. McGillis-Hiner

United States District Court, District of Montana
Oct 27, 2021
CV 19-50-H-DLC (D. Mont. Oct. 27, 2021)

Opinion

CV 19-50-H-DLC

10-27-2021

JASON NEWBERRY, Plaintiff, v. CINDY McGILLIS-HINER; CONNIE WINNER; DR. REES; DR. HURST; WARDEN LYNN GUYER; REGINALD MICHAEL; and MELISSA SCHARF, Defendants.


ORDER

DANA L. CHRISTENSEN, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

On September 8, 2021, this Court entered judgment on all claims in Defendants' favor. On September 27, 2021, Newberry submitted a “motion to object” (Doc. 189). Construing it as a motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b), the Court denied it on October 14, 2021 (Doc. 190).

Repeating the arguments made in his previous motion to reconsider, Newberry now seeks reconsideration of the Order denying his motion to reconsider. See “Objection” (Doc. 191) at 1-3. The Court sees no reason to continue on this path.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Newberry's motion (Doc. 191) is DENIED. The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal from this disposition would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Newberry v. McGillis-Hiner

United States District Court, District of Montana
Oct 27, 2021
CV 19-50-H-DLC (D. Mont. Oct. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Newberry v. McGillis-Hiner

Case Details

Full title:JASON NEWBERRY, Plaintiff, v. CINDY McGILLIS-HINER; CONNIE WINNER; DR…

Court:United States District Court, District of Montana

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

Citations

CV 19-50-H-DLC (D. Mont. Oct. 27, 2021)