From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newberg v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 21, 1961
296 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 45, Docket 26669.

Argued November 1, 1961.

Decided November 21, 1961.

Herbert M. Markham, of Markham Strauss, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert M. Hausman, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before CLARK, HINCKS, and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges.


We affirm on the reasoned opinion of Judge Metzner below, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 187 F. Supp. 158. As he shows, while failure of the government to file a tax claim against a bankrupt estate will prevent sharing in that estate, Bankruptcy Act, § 57, sub. n, 11 U.S.C. § 93, sub. n, yet the personal liability of the taxpayer remains and is not affected by a discharge, Bankruptcy Act, § 17, sub. a, 11 U.S.C. § 35, sub. a. The statutory provision is quite explicit and there is no room for estoppel or other defense. Hence the plaintiff's claim for income tax refund must fail notwithstanding his discharge in bankruptcy. California State Bd. of Equalization v. Coast Radio Products, 9 Cir., 228 F.2d 520; Salsbury Motors, Inc. v. United States, 9 Cir., 210 F.2d 171, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 953, 74 S.Ct. 679, 98 L.Ed. 1099; Menick v. Hoffman, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 365, cited on argument by plaintiff, is not directly in point, but indeed looks the other way and in accord with the cases cited above; it holds the bankrupt "aggrieved" by a referee's order refusing a late amendment to increase the amount of a tax claim.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Newberg v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 21, 1961
296 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Newberg v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Mal NEWBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 21, 1961

Citations

296 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Spring Hill Nurseries Co. v. Lindley

Nevertheless, the tax liability is not discharged or dischargeable under Section 17a(1). See Newberg v.…

King v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

However, if, as here, the Commissioner does not follow that procedure but issues a notice of deficiency…