From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newark v. Martin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jun 26, 1941
20 A.2d 702 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Argued October 17, 1940 —

Decided June 26, 1941.

On appeal from judgments of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 125 N.J.L. 103.

For the appellant Town of Westfield, cities of Elizabeth, Burlington, New Brunswick, Hackensack, towns of Kearny, Montclair, Township of Millburn in the County of Essex and Borough of Somerville, Herbert J. Hannoch.

For the appellant City of Paterson, John F. Evans.

For the appellant City of Plainfield, William Newcorn.

For the appellant Town of Nutley, William F. Gorman.

For the appellant City of Summit, Frederick C. Kentz.

For the appellant City of Trenton, Louis Josephson.

Of counsel for the foregoing appellants, Herbert J. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein.

For the respondent, James F.X. O'Brien ( Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).


These cases are ruled by the determination reached by this court in the case of Jersey City et al. v. Martin, expressed in an opinion filed this day, 127 N.J.L. 18; and the judgments are accordingly reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, HAGUE, JJ. 11.


Summaries of

Newark v. Martin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jun 26, 1941
20 A.2d 702 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Newark v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR-RESPONDENT, v. J.H…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jun 26, 1941

Citations

20 A.2d 702 (N.J. 1941)
20 A.2d 702