From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newark v. Martin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 3, 1941
19 A.2d 47 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1941 —

Decided April 3, 1941.

On appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 125 N.J.L. 219.

For the appellant, James F.X. O'Brien ( Joseph A. Ward, of counsel).

For the respondent Cities of Elizabeth, New Brunswick, Trenton, Hackensack, Burlington, the Towns of Montclair, Morristown, Westfield, the Borough of Somerville and other municipalities, Herbert J. Hannoch.

For the respondent City of Paterson, John F. Evans.

For the respondent City of Plainfield, William Newcorn.

For the respondent Borough of Sayreville, Joseph T. Karcher.

Of counsel for the foregoing respondents, Herbert P. Hannoch and Morris Weinstein.


These cases are ruled by the determination reached by this court in the case of City of Jersey City et al. v. Martin, expressed in an opinion filed this day, 126 N.J.L. 353; and the judgments are accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Newark v. Martin

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 3, 1941
19 A.2d 47 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Newark v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. J.H…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 3, 1941

Citations

19 A.2d 47 (N.J. 1941)
19 A.2d 47