From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newark v. Cook

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 916 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Decided January 31st, 1927.

On appeal of Charles F. McEuen et al.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J. Eq. 527.

Mr. Cecil H. MacMahon, for the appellant.

Messrs. McCarter English, for the defendants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Newark v. Cook

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1927
135 A. 916 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Newark v. Cook

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF NEWARK, complainant, v. HUGH F. COOK et al., defendants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1927

Citations

135 A. 916 (N.J. 1927)
135 A. 916
135 A. 915
100 N.J. Eq. 583

Citing Cases

N.J. Sports Exposition Auth. v. E. Rutherford

In Schill v. Essex Freeholder Board, 98 N.J. Eq. 469, 470 (Ch. 1926), where the tenant unsuccessfully sought…

Housing Auth., Bor. of Clementon v. Myers

The owner is ordinarily obliged to pay the expense of the removal of any movable personalty that he does not…