From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 29, 1938
199 A. 12 (N.J. 1938)

Opinion

Submitted February 11, 1938 —

Decided April 29, 1938.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 118 N.J.L. 556.

For the appellant, George H. Rosenstein.

For the respondent, Schotland Schotland.


The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

There were, however, grounds for reversal urged in the court below which are not presented and argued here.

They were, error in the charge of the trial court, and refusal to charge a request of the defendant below.

Upon affirming upon the opinion of the Supreme Court we are not passing upon the foregoing grounds of appeal. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer

Court of Errors and Appeals
Apr 29, 1938
199 A. 12 (N.J. 1938)
Case details for

Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer

Case Details

Full title:NEWARK LIVE POULTRY COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NATHAN FAUER…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 29, 1938

Citations

199 A. 12 (N.J. 1938)
199 A. 12

Citing Cases

Post v. Gerson Bacher, Torrid K-9, Inc.

ill, 83 N.J. Eq. 3, 5 (Ch. 1913) (an inference of fraud must be clearly established), affirmed 83 N.J. Eq. at…

N.J. Mtge. and Invest. Co. v. Dorsey

As to fraud, no problem is presented. It must be pleaded as a defense, R.R. 4:8-3, and the onus of proving it…