From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York St. Housing Fin. Ag. v. Local 2110

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1997
239 A.D.2d 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 6, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.).


Since petitioner's position is that only an individually aggrieved employee may initiate a grievance-procedure, a condition precedent to entry into the arbitration process is at issue, and it is an issue for the court to resolve ( see, Matter of Cassone, 63 N.Y.2d 756, 759; Matter of Lassiter v. CNA Ins. Co., 195 A.D.2d 362, 363). The court correctly determined that the collective bargaining agreement, construed as a whole ( see, County of Westchester v. Mahoney, 56 N.Y.2d 756), does not reflect that appellant union has any right to initiate a grievance procedure in its own name. The record establishes that petitioner did not impede satisfaction of the condition precedent ( see, Young v Whitney, 111 A.D.2d 1013, 1014). We have considered appellant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

New York St. Housing Fin. Ag. v. Local 2110

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 6, 1997
239 A.D.2d 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

New York St. Housing Fin. Ag. v. Local 2110

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK STATE HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Respondent, v. LOCAL 2110, UNITED…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 6, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 157 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 623